Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Tallon Griekspoor Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zandschulp vs Griekspoor analysis and find out who is favored!
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Tallon Griekspoor Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 2 - 2 Griekspoor
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zandschulp has won 46.27% of points on their second serve, while Griekspoor has won 55%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 49.29% of their opponent's second serve points, while Griekspoor has won 45.33%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.02% and 25.07% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zandschulp has saved 58.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Griekspoor has saved 64.95% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zandschulp has won 46.43% of matches played (W/L 26/ 30), with Griekspoor winning 60.32% (W/L 38/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 10/ 12). Griekspoor has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 68% (W/L 19/ 9), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 60/ 47).
- Player level: In the last year, Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 9/ 15), where as Griekspoor has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 69.7% of matches (W/L 23/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Zandschulp winning 1 times and Griekspoor being victorious 2 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 4 and Griekspoor winning 5. The last match between Zandschulp and Griekspoor was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 18-01-2023, Second, Hard with Tallon Griekspoor getting the victory 6-4 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:33:12.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zandschulp and Griekspoor have played a deciding set 1 times, with Zandschulp winning 0 times and Griekspoor 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Zandschulp winning 1, and Griekspoor 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 172.84 while Griekspoor has played against players with an average rank of 122.46.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zandschulp has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Griekspoor has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zandschulp has converted 38.74% of breakpoint opportunities, and Griekspoor has converted 41.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
99
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
2
Total2
1
Hard1
0
Clay1
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
23
Rank
21
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
63% (332-199)
Career Total W/L
63% (380-219)
40% (12-18)
YTD W/L
60% (18-12)
$2,900,825
Career Prize Money
$2,676,690
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Tallon Griekspoor For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Zandschulp VS Griekspoor
Sportsbook
Offer
Zandschulp VS Griekspoor H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Tallon Griekspoor |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 5 |
| Games Won | 39 | 42 |
| Aces (Total) | 16 | 14 |
| DFs (Total) | 11 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:12 | 1:33:12 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (150/250) | 68% (194/285) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (109/150) | 69% (134/194) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (47/100) | 45% (41/91) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 47% (8/17) | 53% (10/19) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (110/285) | 38% (94/250) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Zandschulp VS Griekspoor H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
72%
(
69 of
96)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
9
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
30 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
100
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 6-3 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
53%
(
37 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
| 6-1 3-6 6-1 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| 6-0 ret. |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve %
76%
(
16 of
21)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
85%
(
11 of
13)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
27
Total Points Won
12
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Tallon Griekspoor |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (12/18) | 60% (18/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 41% (28/41) | 54% (45/39) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (314/360) | 49% (431/440) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 45% (5/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) | 58% (7/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 83% (5/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.4 | 0.65 |
| Aces Total | 130 | 278 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 98 | 100 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:50 | 2:6:48 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 181.13 | 133.77 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1326/2130) | 64% (1710/2690) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (906/1326) | 74% (1260/1710) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (372/804) | 55% (539/980) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (74/191) | 42% (60/144) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (817/2138) | 32% (842/2606) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 67% (4/2) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (5/5) | 50% (5/5) |
| Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 100% (2/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 38% (5/8) | 58% (7/5) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (12/27) | 58% (14/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 67% (4/6) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (7/14) | 62% (16/26) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 71% (10/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 73% (15/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 27% (15/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 6% (18/1) | 47% (15/7) |
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
92)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
8
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
41)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
54%
(
41 of
76)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
97
Total Points Won
64
|
6-1 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
47%
(
36 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Quentin Halys
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
66%
(
87 of
132)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
121)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
44 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
121)
129
Total Points Won
124
|
7-5 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Facundo Bagnis
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Zachary Svajda
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
57 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
29 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tallon Griekspoor Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
65%
(
77 of
119)
1st Serve %
64%
(
77 of
121)
16
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
82%
(
63 of
77)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
64 of
77)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
32 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
31 of
121)
118
Total Points Won
122
|
6-7(3) 7-6(7) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
75%
(
115 of
153)
1st Serve %
69%
(
111 of
161)
11
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
70%
(
80 of
115)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
74 of
111)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
34%
(
52 of
153)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
63 of
161)
164
Total Points Won
150
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 4-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Luciano Darderi
63%
(
59 of
94)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
99)
15
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
71%
(
25 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
27 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
108
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(2) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
56%
(
60 of
107)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
9
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
5
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
57%
(
27 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
43%
(
46 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
103)
110
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 6-4 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Denis Shapovalov
57%
(
59 of
104)
1st Serve %
64%
(
62 of
97)
5
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
4
85%
(
50 of
59)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
51 of
62)
62%
(
28 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
26 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
26 of
97)
104
Total Points Won
97
|
6-7(7) 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Christopher Eubanks
46%
(
32 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
57 of
83)
4
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
44 of
57)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
75
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francesco Passaro
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
7
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
4
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
50 of
57)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
26 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
29 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
8
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
97%
(
32 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Holger Rune
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
64%
(
67 of
105)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
22 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Taro Daniel
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
73%
(
68 of
93)
11
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
44 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
44 of
68)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
24%
(
20 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Zandschulp Vs Griekspoor Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Zandschulp are available here and Griekspoor photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Tallon Griekspoor
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
